On 01/06/2017 05:37 AM, Casey Connor wrote:
> Hi -- I'm using GIMP 2.9.5, the "edge", via the > otto-kesselgulasch-gimp-edge PPA. Hi Casey, > Is it appropriate to report bugs for that version at bugzilla.gnome.org, > or is it too alpha for bug reports? yes, it is appropriate. Even more than appropriate, it is essential to GIMP development: If you do not report bugs in a development version, then it is likely they stay in for all eternity unless someone else happens to encounter the same same. This is under the assumption that you are going to update GIMP from this repository quite frequently, as changes happen every day. If you are afraid to report bugs other people have reported already, then use the bug tracker links below to search for the issue you have encountered before reporting a bug. But even if you find one, you may still be able to contribute additional information, especially if comments in the bug ask for this. The question remaining would be where to report the bugs, as both the gimp-edge repository maintainer and GIMP itself maintain a bug tracker, respectively: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~otto-kesselgulasch https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=GIMP The GIMP developers prefer when bugs encountered in third-party builds (this includes Linux distros, too) are reported in the bug trackers specific to that build. >From there, it can either be forwarded by the build and/or tracker maintainers is deemed necessary. It can also be done by the users reporting the bugs, either to ensure the bug is known in general or if the maintainers turn out to be unresponsive. Please include a reference to the other bugs in such cases. For build made from the code as-is, it almost doesn't matter where the bug is reported. But there can still be platform-specific issues the build maintainer is much more aware of than the GIMP developers are. For modified builds, getting the build maintainer to do an active part in bug research and triaging is crucial. > If it's appropriate, what version should I pick from the menu: "git > master", or "unspecified" (and then specify in the description, > obviously)? The version options only go to 2.9.4. An important thing to realize is that there is not "one" 2.9.5, but many - this version number is used by the current development master branch, and so every build made from there currently uses the 2.9.5 version number. So using "git master" is appropriate. The 2.9.5 version serves as an indication of what we are dealing with in general - a build made from the development branch past the 2.9.4 release. The commit id can become interesting if we're trying to figure out if a bug may still be present, or if it is supposed to be gone already. The commit id is shown in the empty image window and in the Help -> About dialog, and looks like "commit 8a15064" with whatever commit id your build was based on. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
