On 01/11/2017 06:59 PM, Thorsten Stettin wrote:
> I understand, but I need to provide packages for Ubuntu LTS versions at > least. I'll do my very best regarding backporting. Shit! Not necessarily - you could decide "no, users of LTS versions where dependencies are not available aren't going to get the bleeding-edge development versions of GIMP. Or you could try to switch to one of the emerging package formats like AppImage or Flatpak et al and provide 2.9.x this way. This might also help with having both 2.8.x and 2.9.x available to the users at the same time, thus maximizing their ability to compare their behavior. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
