Hi, "Mattias Engdeg�rd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think they are that bad --- the readability of the above code > merely suffers from a pollution of backslashes and underscores. I took this code out of a macro and forgot to remove the backslashes. Also we'd use different types since glib defines guint8, guint16 and guint32. I choose not to show off the code for RGB16 and RGB15 since the masks and shifting values used there make the code hard to understand, while the RGB32 and ARGB cases are more obvious. Also fortunately, we don't do RGB16 in gimp. Salut, Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Brian Weber
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Jens Ch. Restemeier
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Brian Weber
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Mattias Engdeg�rd
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Mattias Engdeg�rd
- Re: [Gimp-developer] Solaris 64bit compile Daniel Egger
