On 06 Mar 2003 18:47:12 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
And I replied some silly things...

Hmmm...  Looks like I misread Sven's message.  I thought that you wanted the
option of having a license _with_ advertising clause.  I did not see the
"o" in "w/o".  Silly me!  So of course there is no need for dual licensing
in this case.  Forget what I said in my previous message.  Doh!

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to