On 06 Mar 2003 18:47:12 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I replied some silly things...
Hmmm... Looks like I misread Sven's message. I thought that you wanted the
option of having a license _with_ advertising clause. I did not see the
"o" in "w/o". Silly me! So of course there is no need for dual licensing
in this case. Forget what I said in my previous message. Doh!
Gimp-developer mailing list