On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:16:27PM +0200, Tomas Ogren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vim? emacs? .. I bet there are many editors that can handle large text
> files..
One thing (to bring this more on-topic again) to note is that vim doesn't
handle "large" (gigabytes) files nice, loading it into memory. The same
is probably true for emacs. The only editor I know (I didn't test millions
of them though), that nicely handles large files is joe, as it does't load
them into memory.
For images, which might become big especially when storing a lot of extra
info (undo info etc.), this is an issue ;)
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
