On 14 Jan 2004 13:25:44 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RaphaŽl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think that the tool status always being visible is mandatory.
> IMO it would be sufficient to be able to replace messages. Tools will
> set the statusbar every so often anyway.
That's right. It would still be a problem if the interactive message
from the tool has to compete with a plug-in updating the message
showing its progress, but this is not a very serious issue for the
> At this point we are not
> seeking for a perfect solution but for a quick fix for 2.0. The
> proposal that needs the smallest amount of changes should definitely
> be favored at this point.
OK, I agree. Let's use a quick fix for 2.0 and then see how the API
can be improved later (e.g., for 2.2). So I will try to work on bug
#124040, assuming that bug #120175 could be fixed soon.
Gimp-developer mailing list