On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> [restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
> > > [technical discussion  :)]
> > > I think I already explained why I prefer the set of ratios based on
> > > the idea of "homogenous zooming". So the rest of this Mail focuses 
> > > on the technical issues of your patch.
> > 
> > The last patch I sent does homogenous zooming, has no more (known)
> > floating issues (I am not gonna bet about floats, what is more, not
> > gonna bet about Gimp either, I saw some warnings about aliasing in
> > other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it
> > just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes.
> True. (These "break strict aliasing rules" warnings however are harmless
> according to Yosh.)

Well, not all are harmless. Just that a lot of them are spurious, but some
of them do signify real problems. It's a mess.
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to