Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think what the OP really meant to ask whether GIMP requires a
> *pre-emptively* multitasking OS. I.e. one that can interrupt a
> running process that has exceeded its timeslice, even if it doesn't
> do any system calls (or similar) that gives the kernel a chance to
> let another process have the CPU. (For instance, Windows 3.1 wasn't
> able to do that.) As far as I can guess, sure, GIMP might work on
> such a system...

I don't think GIMP plug-ins would work w/o proper multitasking and
using GIMP w/o plug-ins doesn't make too much sense.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to