Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I just tried the new photocopy, cartoon and softglow plug-ins, and > > IMHO, when compared to similiar ones, the correct colocation of them > > would not be in the "artistic" category. They'd better fall under > > "distorts", maybe with softglow going into "Light Effects" > > Artistic is perhaps not the right place (at least for Photocopy and > Softglow, it makes a lot of sense for Cartoon) but why would you want > to put them to Distorts? These plug-ins do not distort the pixels at > all.
Softglow seems to fit into the "Light Effects" category, Cartoon might as well be filed in the "Edge Detect" category, but "Artistic is OK as well. Photocopy is tricky but I think the "Artistic" category doesn't seem too off for me. I as well pondered about the "Colors" category. Hmm. We could introduce a "Degrade" category (complementary to "Enhance"), put all the "noise" plugins there and the Photocopy thing as well. Bye, Simon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/ _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer