Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I just tried the new photocopy, cartoon and softglow plug-ins, and
> > IMHO, when compared to similiar ones, the correct colocation of them
> > would not be in the "artistic" category. They'd better fall under
> > "distorts", maybe with softglow going into "Light Effects"
> Artistic is perhaps not the right place (at least for Photocopy and
> Softglow, it makes a lot of sense for Cartoon) but why would you want
> to put them to Distorts? These plug-ins do not distort the pixels at
Softglow seems to fit into the "Light Effects" category, Cartoon might
as well be filed in the "Edge Detect" category, but "Artistic is OK as
well. Photocopy is tricky but I think the "Artistic" category doesn't
seem too off for me. I as well pondered about the "Colors" category.
Hmm. We could introduce a "Degrade" category (complementary to
"Enhance"), put all the "noise" plugins there and the Photocopy thing as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/
Gimp-developer mailing list