RaphaŽl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This meta tarball would not be very hard to create or maintain: it's
> just that the version numbers would have to be increased from time to
> time, whenever the contents of a new gimp/gimp-gap/gimp-perl/... tarball
> are extracted and included in the meta tarball.  This would not require
> much effort.

You should talk to Havoc one day and ask him why this meta tarball
thing didn't work for GTK+. I don't think it is as easy as you put it.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to