Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I for one prefer Bills' approach much to what we have now; but
> lets see what you'll come up with.

I didn't say it's worse than the current approach but it completely
contradicts all the work that has gone into GIMP in order to pave the
way for better selection tools. I don't want to see that work being
wasted and since we are at the very beginning of a development cycle,
we don't need to go for quick-and-dirty solutions.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to