On 27.02.2005, at 17:24, Sven Neumann wrote:

Incidentally this is exactly what I'm testing right now. ;=)

Incidentally that is what the code in CVS is doing. Looks like we were
working on the same code. We should perhaps start using mutexes on the
source code ;)

Heh, you did not only do the same but you've chosen the exact same approach and function names...

At least I have the performance figures you don't ;-p


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to