On 27.02.2005, at 17:24, Sven Neumann wrote:
Incidentally this is exactly what I'm testing right now. ;=)
Incidentally that is what the code in CVS is doing. Looks like we were working on the same code. We should perhaps start using mutexes on the source code ;)
Heh, you did not only do the same but you've chosen the exact same approach and function names...
At least I have the performance figures you don't ;-p
Description: This is a digitally signed message part