Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On 11/1/05, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Much of the GIMP development over the last few years have been about
>>modularizing and gobjectifying the code this has lead to a separation
>>that will make a merge with GEGL easier in the future. At the moment I
>>think the GIMP code base is in a phase where gradual replacement of
>>the code with GEGL based bits could happen if GEGL was ready, but GEGL
>>isn't ready.
> Would it be a good idea to create a TODO list for GEGL, so that
> everyone interested could have a look and pick a task that he would be
> able to accomplish? seems to be something like that.

If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood
on the shoulders of giants.  -- Isaac Newton

Roel Schroeven

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to