Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> My current plan encompasses a few steps outlined below. Perhaps
> I'll add
> a quick mode which would be similar to the clone tool lateron.
I have no idea who we will help with a non-quick mode.
I see that this tool can be integrated in the clone tool,
for an interaction architect that is a 'done deal.'
> For the "quick mode" the user starts by specifying a point somewhere
> within his source area. Then - exactly like the clone tool - he paints
> the destination area. BUT, once he/she releases the mouse button or
> lifts the pen, the healing algorithm would be started.
I can live with a "clone, and then see the paint dry" effect,
as it gets the job done.
> It will give bad
> results if the boundary of the destination area still contains
> "defective" pixels.
So if you do not heal all defective pixels, you will not have
complete healing? sounds fair enough to me.
I would like to ask you if you can help us with two things:
1) is it possible for the user to incrementally include the defective
pixels in the healing (heal these additional pixels with the brush)
and in a relatively short time, the healing would be 'perfect.'
2) can you in very clever way pretend the defective boundary pixels
should also be healed in order to do a good job on actually to be
principal user interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture
Gimp-developer mailing list