On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:08 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote:

> If this change is implemented in GEGL, does that mean it will make it
> into 2.6?

Probably not as it seems rather unlikely that we will start to use GEGL
for the layer modes in 2.6 already.

> If not, wouldn't it make more sense to allow Jesper to improve 2.6,
> then port it to GEGL (and remove the non-CMS aware version)?

We don't want the core to depend on lcms. Also there are some other
problems here, such as that we can not change a layer mode as that would
break backwards compatibility.


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to