I've filed the bug as 583778 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583778).
Cheers. Ionutz On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Ioan Calin Borcoman <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's hope it gets applied. I'll make a bug report and attach the patch to it. > > My code uses something like this to send the data: > > def send(self, msg): > l = len(msg) > raw = 'G' + struct.pack('H%ds' % l, socket.htons(l), msg) > self.socket.send(raw) > > To receive the data, I use something like: > ... > raw = self.socket.recv(4) > ... > l = socket.ntohs(struct.unpack('H', raw[2:4])[0]) > raw = self.socket.recv(int(l)) > > Worked ok until now. Very similar with your code :) > > Cheers, > > Ionutz > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Niels Giesen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have attached a small patch for script-fu-server that makes the >>> server return to the clients the output of the commands executed, just >>> like the script-fu-console does. >>> >>> Is the patch ok? Any chance to apply it the mainline? Should I make a >>> bug-report and attach the patch to it? >>> >>> Thanx, >>> >>> Ionutz >> >> This is great stuff. If we had had this a year ago, it would have >> saved me a *lot* of ugly hacking about developing the client side >> gimp-mode for Emacs. (If you wanna know, this was done by >> wrapping the code to be sent >> inside scheme code that wrote back to a file, with stuff such as >> tracing and the various write and display functions not working). >> The other implementation I did to interact with GIMP was with GIMP as >> a subprocess as >> a batch program; this is quite crude and does not work under that other OS >> I have to use at work. >> >> Attached is a small python program (my first) I wrote this morning that gives >> a simple REPL interface to the script-fu server based on your >> patch, you might want to use that for testing if your patch works. So >> far it is going strong. >> >> I very much like to see this one implemented, and am working on >> rewriting parts of gimp-mode for Emacs to use this facility. Even >> though the script-fu server apparently was not intended for actual >> use, its usefulness at least for developing script-fu inside an editor >> of choice >> is greatly enhanced with these additions. >> >> It is looking promising. >> >> Regards, >> Niels. >> >> -- >> http://niels.kicks-ass.org >> > _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
