On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 15:17 +0300, LightningIsMyName wrote:

> I have seen the question of how to give a name for a script/plugin in
> many places, and most recently here:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588755#c10
> Although there are no standard naming rules, I suggest that we styart
> to use strict naming rules.

I don't think that is necessary. The procedure name is just a unique
identifier. It doesn't have to follow a naming scheme. And we are only
creating lots of work and potential trouble if we start to rename our
procedures now.

For GIMP 3.0, where we don't have to care about strict backward
compatibility, it might make sense to introduce a stricter naming scheme
for procedures (if we still have that concept then).


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to