Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, then I think you misunderstood me.
> > What I suggested was added XCF as a nice add-on to gdk-pixbuf for
> > the situation where gdk-pixbuf is used under the GPL.
> > Of cause, this means that you can't use XCF loading in a proprietary
> > app where you use gdk-pixbuf under the LGPL.
> Maybe. It's a big can of worms though - can Red Hat and SuSE ship the
> XCF add-on, for example? Probably not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (private)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)