In message <4f0b705b.2070...@pilobilus.net>,
Steve Kinney <ad...@pilobilus.net> wrote:
>On 01/09/2012 05:15 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> I did that, and actually, yes, the specific image I'm working with seems to
>> have benefitted from having the defringer run on it twice. Here's the image
>> after ONE and then TWO defringing steps:
>As a general rule, it's not a good idea to edit, save, open, and
>re-edit a .jpg image. The .jpg format is a "lossy" compressed
Yea yea. I know.
If I was doing this professionally, or for publication, then I would have
been more careful and saved the intermediate result as a .XCF file. But
I'm just messing around here, trying to see what this whiz-bang purple
de-fringer can really do. And so far, I'm pretty damned impressed. It
really does a nice job... even better if you run it twice.
gimp-user-list mailing list