In message <4f0b705b.2070...@pilobilus.net>, Steve Kinney <ad...@pilobilus.net> wrote:
>On 01/09/2012 05:15 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> I did that, and actually, yes, the specific image I'm working with seems to >> have benefitted from having the defringer run on it twice. Here's the image >> after ONE and then TWO defringing steps: >> >> ftp://ftp.tristatelogic.com/private/gimp/squirrel-c.jpg >> ftp://ftp.tristatelogic.com/private/gimp/squirrel-d.jpg > >As a general rule, it's not a good idea to edit, save, open, and >re-edit a .jpg image. The .jpg format is a "lossy" compressed >format... Yea yea. I know. If I was doing this professionally, or for publication, then I would have been more careful and saved the intermediate result as a .XCF file. But I'm just messing around here, trying to see what this whiz-bang purple de-fringer can really do. And so far, I'm pretty damned impressed. It really does a nice job... even better if you run it twice. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
