On 05/12/2012 10:25 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> I followed your suggestions and built
> babl-0.1.11/gegl-0.2.1/Gimp-2.8.0 using -Ofast -ffast-math
> -ftree-vectorize. Using these flags, I reran the test at the top of
> the thread. The c2g rendering on my machine is now 36 seconds as
> compared to 6 minutes. I am impressed. :)
If it makes such a difference, shouldn't they be defaults?
> Now to test out gimp 2.9.1. That should be fun.
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Øyvind Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jernej Simončič
>> <jernej|s-gm...@eternallybored.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:31:26 +0200, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>>>> It also turns out that babl and GEGL on win32 seem to be compiled
>>>> practically without optimization and without taking modern instruction
>>>> sets into account, making any testing of them on windows
>>>> unrepresentative of their actual performance.
>>> What are the recommended optimization flags?
>> On win32, no idea, perhaps look at what compiler flags are being used
>> on linux? This is signal processing code and everything from
>> -ffast-math to -ftree-vectorize and probably more are important.
>> «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed»
>> -- William Gibson
>> http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/
>> gimp-user-list mailing list
> gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list mailing list