On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 06:11:09PM -0700, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> You need either the dcraw or ufraw plug-in for GIMP. I prefer the > >> dcraw plug-in. The ufraw plug-in has too many options about what > >> should be done to the image when it is loaded. I don't know what I > >> might want/need to do to the image until after I load it and look at > >> it. > > So, the downside of this approach is that the decisions you make *during* > > RAW conversion are generally lossless operations; you can go back and do > > them differently with no destruction of data. If you start from a file > > converted in a certain way, you've already lost a lot of flexibility. > Whoa! :-) That is hardly a downside. RAW conversion is something you can > dorepeatedly without degrading the image, as it always starts from the > original > raw data and never modifies it. You don't need to do anything with the ufraw
Let me clarify: it's a downside of doing a simple RAW conversion without "too many options" and taking the result into Gimp to do the bulk of the work. -- Matthew Miller [email protected] <http://mattdm.org/> _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
