On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 17:57 -0400, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> Here is something you can try. Copy the lens database from svn:
> http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/lensfun/trunk/data/db/ and put it the
> appropriate location within lensfun-0.2.7. Rebuild lensfun and you
> should have the D800 with 24-70.
Thank you. I may try that. But I don't really understand why it should
be that hard. Presumably, the program darktable and the gimp filter
gimplensfun are looking somewhere to find correction information. If it
is not in /usr/share/lensfun, where in the world is it?
> Personally, I think you should fix lens distortion (if any) within
> your raw editor rather than in Gimp, but that's me. :)
I ordinarily work in darktable on NEF fiiles, but I somehow managed to
nuke a whole bunch of NEF images and had to instead work with the jpeg
images on my backup card.
> BTW, curious where did you read that the 24-70 is the "standard" lens
> for the D800? I have never heard of the D800 being sold with the 24-70
> as a kit lens (or any lens for that matter).
It is perhaps an exaggeration to call these "the" standard lenses for
the d800. When I was contemplating laying out a fortune for my D800, I
posted a query at Nikonians about which lenses I should consider given
my needs. The 24-70 and 70-200 lenses were both strongly recommended by
several people. Also, my Calumet salesman recommended those same
lenses. I think these lenses are common choices for use with the D800.
They should definitely be in the Lensfun database, and if my reference
above makes any sense, they are, so I am perplexed about why I can't
Fortunately, my lenses have very little distortions, so I may be able to
avoid using corrections.
The 14-24 lens was also recommended, but I didn't think I needed it, and
I had already spent enough money. Later I got a 24 mm tilt-shift
Rokinon lens which was something of a bargain for under $1,000.
Perhaps I should explain that I have been doing view camera 4 x 5
photography with 75 mm, 90 mm, 150 mm and 300 mm lenses. I wanted the
Nikon D800 to cover roughly that range. 24 mm is relatively short for
35 mm but not as short as 75 mm is for 4 x 5, so someday I may get a
shorter lens for my D800. One of my interests is architectural
photography, and my 75 mm lens wasn't even short enough to photograph a
building facade from across the street. I had to stitch two images
using hugin to capture that scene. I think I can do the same thing
easily, if the need arises, using 24 mm on my D800,
If I feel a pressing need, I may get a shorter focal length lens for the
D800, but given that I am 80 years old, that need may never arise.
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> <alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only update that article needs is that apparently Hugin is
> capable of outputting XML data for LensFun.
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Pat David
> <patda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alexandre had a neat write up on lgw about using Hugin to
> > correction parameters:
> > --
> > pat david
> > http://blog.patdavid.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > gimp-user-list mailing list
> > List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > List membership:
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address: email@example.com
> List membership:
Leonard Evens l...@math.northwestern.edu
Professor Emeritus, Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list