And that is my intentionm not replacing the raw editoe but calling the external one to receive the edited image
El 13 ene. 2017 5:01 PM, "cerp" <[email protected]> escribió: > Dear all, > > Then we would need to have a fork for RawTherapee, one for LightZone > (which I both prefer to Darktable for RAF file editing) and so on .... > would it not be better to have a mechanism to use the preferred editor? > > Best Regards > > Quoting Andrey Goreev <[email protected]>: > > I agree 100% but digikam devs have their own point of view on how the >> program should look like and we need to respect it. >> This is how fork projects appear. If it is not too complicated to replace >> libraw with darktable a fork could be not a bad idea. >> Someone will have to maintain it though, new versions of both digikam and >> darktable come out pretty frequently. >> >> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. >> -------- Original message --------From: Juan Jose Casafranca < >> [email protected]> Date: 2017-01-13 8:29 AM (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam - >> Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open >> source <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], >> darktable-user <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Digikam >> raw files and darktable >> Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to >> develop this module :-) >> 2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <[email protected]>: >> >> On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> They need a way to organize >> their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files, which >> DT is >> good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library >> management). >> For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement: >> digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on >> where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it into an >> all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising relatively mediocre >> modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, digikam is an >> excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, the best >> Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and >> perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by >> using only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program. >> Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along…. >> > > > > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: [email protected] List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
