Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to develop this module :-)
2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <hevii...@gmail.com>: > > On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They need a way to organize > their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files, which > DT is > good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library > management). > > > For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement: > digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on > where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it into an > all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising relatively mediocre > modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, digikam is an > excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, the best > Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and > perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by > using only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program. > > Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along…. > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
