"I am asking instead to the many enthusiast of GIMP that (I suppose) have
more
graphic capabilities than developers."
I am a graphic designer and I disagree with your premise that GIMP needs a
revamp to its "look". The world is full of products that have a great
"look"or are even "sexy" but don't deliver. GIMP delivers. I want software
that works and is stable.
• What is of far greater importance, IMHO, is functionality. Does it work as
advertised? Yes.
• Does it install easily? Is it stable? Critical to being accepted.
• Is the interface well-designed (absolutely critical for usability)? Mostly
(v 2.8).
• Does it have a good manual/help system? Yes, once you get used to it.
• Can the manual be better? Yes.
• Can the appearance of the GUI be changed to suit the user? In other words
does it have an option to get rid of that gawd-awful flat black livery.
Hopefully.
Cosmetic changes are a waste of time.
Focus on functionality and the GUI.
Rick S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maurizio Paglia
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2017 6:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP name, icon and general graphic look
...
I am not asking the developers to carry on this task, they have to invest
their time in coding and make GIMP more and more valid.
I am asking instead to the many enthusiast of GIMP that (I suppose) have
more
graphic capabilities than developers.
...
Thank you,
Maurizio
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: [email protected]
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: [email protected]
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
