On Sunday, July 28, 2019, Janet Karabin via gimp-user-list < gimp-user-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> I just downloaded the Windows Version of GIMP and when I came to the > section > of tutorial indicating: > > > > “Also notice I have shown a different option under Quality → > Interpolation. The default value for this is Cubic, but to retain the best > quality it would better to use Sinc (Lanczos3).” > > > > My only options were: > > > > None > > Linear > > Cubic > > NoHalo > > LoHalo > > > > I want to enlarge smaller photos while maintaining pixel integrity. > > > > How do I get the Sinc option as referenced in the tutorial? Or which option > should I choose for similar results. > > I read on pippin.gimp.org some time ago that either *alo was the best option. Best is to try them out and use your own judgement. Enlargement is always a challenge. I had a discussion once about the benefits of enlarging in stages. After all that the thing that I know is that enlargement is a challenge. carol _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
