On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:44:28PM -0600, Timothy Jedlicka bonzopad <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is a setting of 1 truly equal to a lossless jpg?
No.
> 2. Is file size the only reason not to use quality=1. It still seems like a
> bargain compared to tif file size.
I think so, too, but it's user-settable.
If you have a colelction of e.g. 2000000 pictures, it's a bargain to use
0.8 or 0.9, too... it all depends on the application and your personal
taste.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
