I've downsampled from 1562x1562 (crop) to 64x64 (avatar). And the incremental scaling produced definetely better results. GIMP 2.2.3, Windows, cubic scaling.
David Hodson wrote:
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
It is known incremental scaling produces better results than one-step scaling.
Only if your scaling algoroithm is not very good. Better would be to fix any problems in the scaling algorithm, and scale in a single pass.
-- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich
_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
