On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Carol Spears wrote:
> She compared the gimps histogram with adopees and they were very
> different. Unfortunately, she doesn't know how to get a screenshot from
> her powerfully expensive program so I am unable to make the same visual
> comparison.
Tell her to hit the "print screen" key then [crtl]+[n] for a new image and
[ctrl]+[v] to paste the screenshot into the new image.
Print Screen Key! heh.
Are the hisograms radically different? Here is another fun
experiment... Open a photo in Gimp and do a grab of the histogram.
Now open the same image in Photoshop and do a grab.
Return to Gimp and open the image again... how does the hist look now?
Its always been a theory of mine that photoshop does a clandestine save
when you first open an image. (but you didn't hear that from me)
Just use the gimp and forget about photoshop. :-) Photoshop does not
have a Wilbur. (Its got that creepy eye)
--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/
"Everybody loves the GIMP!"
http://www.gimp.org/
