Hi Guido, On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 22:00 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Markus, > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:58:17PM +0200, Markus Lehtonen wrote: > > On 01/12/15 19:35, "git-buildpackage on behalf of Guido Günther" > > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >Hi Markus, > > >On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:51:24AM +0200, Markus Lehtonen wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On 27/11/15 17:38, "Guido Günther" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Hi Markus, > > >> >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Markus Lehtonen wrote: > > >>
[...SNIP...] > > >> > > >> Is there something specific? At least it shouldn't affect (deb > > >> )buildpackage at all because zip archives are not supported there. > > > > > >Mostly misreading the code on my end too early in the morning. I'll have > > >to run the performance tests to see if git_archive_submodules regresses > > >once merged but that should be about it. > > > > OK. > > Merged now. I fixed the case where we don't have the submodules checked > out too. Great news! I now rebased all my github branches on top of the latest master. If you could pull the first two patches from 'feature/buildpackage-rpm' branch: - "buildpackage_rpm: implement --native option" - "tests: enable unit tests for buildpackage-rpm" we would get much wider test coverage for buildpackage-rpm. Thanks, Markus _______________________________________________ git-buildpackage mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sigxcpu.org/mailman/listinfo/git-buildpackage
