On May 7, 7:57 am, Konstantin Khomoutov <khomou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 7, 12:51 am, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I notice that almost every tagging example uses a version number with > > a prefixed 'v', e.g. > > > $ tag -a -m "first major point release" v1.0.0 > > > I, on the other hand, have never bothered with 'v' prefix, and have > > always done, e.g.: > > > $ tag -a -m "first major point release" 1.0.0 > > > Is there some reason to use the 'v' that I am unaware? Am I going to > > have issues on other platforms or something? > > I beleive this is just a question of aesthetic preferences. > The only things tag tames might clash with are other "commit-ish" > names such as names of branches or objects (those hashes composed of > hex numbers), so both "1.0.0" and "v1.0.0" have the same chances to > clash with other names.
Cool. Thanks. I feel better about it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To post to this group, send email to git-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
