Yes, my thoughts exactly.

The more that I think about it the less I like the idea. There is a reason
they decided to go with clone, add, merge, commit etc
in the local the local workspace and then push to the servers.




On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen <tfn...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I think you've got a user with some bad ideas.
>
> Gerrit is for code-reviewing, accepting patches into a given branch.
>
> Yes, it can merge patches in, but it can't rebase.
>
> I would definitely not recommend Gerrit as a tool for branching, merging
> and rebasing. Your user just has to learn some Git, using either command
> line, or something like TortoiseGit (I'm assuming this is a Windows user).
>
>
> On Friday, May 27, 2011 7:22:46 PM UTC+2, mbaydiver wrote:
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> I use cGit and really have not found a reason to replace it yet. However I
>> now have a user who wants to do branching, merging
>> and rebase functions through a web interface.
>>
>> I really don't like the idea but I do need to see if it's feasible.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Git for human beings" group.
> To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to