Hi, I guess that a tarball would be the distro of the project, i.e. what is deployed, while a released project should contain the .git repo, with all the history in it so as to let future developers have all the data to start a new development. In such a case what is not needed are the files since they are also contained in the .git repo. I was wandering why there should instead be a need to have also the files (note that a directory with a .git in it and no other files is a project with a pending change in it that is the removal of all files, as reported by git status).
-Angelo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.
