On 11/10/2012 9:12 PM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
> The project has always been trunk/branch/tags as have the others,
> the original clone was --stdlayout and since the svn
> server/network is slow and the project at svn revision 2100+ the
> original clone took 36 hours, (with several restarts), over 5 days
> so I think I would have noticed if a fresh clone had happened, (so
> far I am the only git user).
> Strange.. What does the .gitconfig look like?
> Can you do a git log --name-status and see if the git repository was
> recently restructured like that?
> Did you do anything special to the git-svn clone? Or just a normal git
> svn rebase?
No sign of the restructuring but I have found a slightly older snapshot
of the repository that only has a branches directory, (in addition to my
project root), so it looks to have been a progressive thing. I have
done some fetches to keep current but no rebase.
$ cat .git/config # Slightly sanitised
repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = false
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
symlinks = false
ignorecase = true
hideDotFiles = dotGitOnly
editor = \"C:\\Program Files\\TextPad 5\\TextPad.exe\"
url = https:///URL//svn//App/
fetch = trunk:refs/remotes/trunk
branches = branches/*:refs/remotes/*
tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/*
fetch = :refs/remotes/git-svn
wmstate = normal
geometry = 787x377+259+137 379 169
commitshowpatch = true
url = ../nios/core/public
url = ../Xml_Config
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at