Git Logo by Jason Long <http://twitter.com/jasonlong> is licensed under the
Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your
work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original
creation. This is the most accommodating of the CC licenses offered.
Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
So you can use Jason's logos or modifications of them, so long as you give
him credit (just a simple "Original logo by Jason Long, licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License" would likely be good
git itself is GPLv2 licensed. But I can't find anything about being
allowed to say "Git integrated" or some such thing. What is really of
concern to me is: "Is a git hook part of git itself?" If so, then the GPL
would require that you distribute the source. But if a git hook is more
like an independent program which uses git, then you wouldn't need to
distribute source. This is definitely above my pay grade. IANAL nor do I
play one on TV.
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:59:45 AM UTC-6, lalebarde wrote:
> I am building a new SaaS product and a new company for it. This product
> will add some functionalities to Git via hooks. So I don't modify Git nor
> redistribute it. My service will be accessible by configuring the Git
> config file.
> Can I advertise my product with mention to Git ? Something like "Git
> integrated" or "A hook for Git" or "Works with Git" or "Makes Git a
> all-in-one solution for blablabla" ?
> Can I use the Git logo for it ?
> Where is the best place to ask permission for it ?