Now that I'm actually digesting this and trying it out, I'm a bit confused. I am using source tree, but I will try and speak in more generic terms.
I forked the main repo through bitbucket ( which has master and develop branches). This gives me https://<myname>@bitbucket.org/<myname>/<project name>.git as the remote repository for my fork. So, I now have *my *fork which has master and develop branches. I then set this fork up as my remote repository (https://<myname>@bitbucket.org/<myname>/<project name>.git). It seems to me it is off this development branch I want to create features. I then push those features back to my repository and create a pull request off that particular feature to the project repo. This will create a new branch in the project repo which can then be merged into the project repo's develop branch and then merged into everyone elses local repos. Is this correct? This brings up another question: when a fork is done on bitbucket, are the develop and master branches in the user's fork ever merged with features? For instance, do I ever add my feature to my develop branch? Or should my develop branch only be updated from the project repos dev branch? Does this question make sense? Basically, am I ever merging my features into my develop and master branches directly? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
