William Lasiewicz <lasiew...@gmail.com> writes: > All I want to do it create a repository on the server, add some files > locally from my machine, push and go to another machine and actually see > those files. > In any other tool, this is completly easy
The Git command structure has grown over time and at no point did someone take firm control of it to ensure that the user interface was easy to understand, that the underlying data structures were straightforward, or that the documentation/books are easy to understand. (You can compare this to Subversion, where it is clear that a very good designer has spent a lot of thought and effort to enforce a simple patterns over both the commands and the data structure, while still allowing a great deal of generality.) Part of this complexity is because GIT supports a decentralized development model, which is more complicated to support. > but in GIT, there is about a > 50% you are going to lose everything. How in the hell can this be so > popular? You've said it yourself, "it is free". Dale -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.