On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:22:56 -0500
> John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I use git at home. I have my normal working directories. I keep the
> > associated bare repository on a NAS box (accessed with NFS, if that
> > matters). I am wondering if it is a good idea to periodically, say
> > monthly, go a git gc --aggressive on the bare repositories which I
> > update almost daily.
> It won't harm but I'm not sure why spend electrons doing --aggressive
> when you can just do --auto in a daily/weekly cron job and let Git
> itself decide whether it wants to get real with your repository and
> actually repack something there.

​I wasn't sure if using git in my working directory would actually pack the
remote bare repository when I did a "git push".​ I appreciate your response.


Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
restore is attempted.

Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be.

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to