This was not the case here, I only used the remote to cherry-pick a few
commits, did not base my work on any of the remote's branches.
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 10:14:36 AM UTC+2, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:52:22AM -0800, Daniel Doron wrote:
> > see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/
> > had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I hope you
> > get the gist.
> It looks to me like you've based your work on the remote repo, i.e. your
> changes are descendants of the commits in the remote repo. If that
> wasn't the case, I believe your `git lola` command should show different
> branches otherwise, and it doesn't.
> Removing a remote will *not* remove the commits made there if you have a
> local branch (e.g. `master`) that's based on those commits.
> Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
> twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
> LeBlanc's law: Later equals never.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.