On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:28 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:18:55AM CEST, I got a letter
> where David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Dunno. I do it personally all the time, with git at least.
> What do others think? :-)

I think pull is pull.  If you are doing lots of local stuff and do not
want it overwritten, it should have been in a forked branch.

> I start to like the pull/update distinction, and I think I'll go for it.

Martin Schlemmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to