Hi Ray,
> Give me a case where assuming it's a replace will do the wrong thing,
> for C code, where it's a variable or function name.
How about two patches.
1. s/foo/bar/ throughout file because foo() has been decided upon
as the name of a new globally visible forthcoming function but was
already in use as a static function.
2. Add definition of new foo().
Patch 1 mustn't be a `darcs replace' despite it changing every occurence
of the C token foo into bar.
Cheers,
Ralph.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
