[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> I was trying to help someone track down a bug that
> occurred between linux-2.6.12 and linux-2.6.13-rc1.
> Since it was very much an unknown where the problem
> was introduced I decided to run git format-patch
> so I could see what all of the differences were.
> Then to be certain the patch series worked I started
> applying them in order.
Sorry, I offhand do not have a good re-design of what
format-patch should do for this purpose; the current design does
not try to deal with anything but a linear sequence of commits,
primarily because the command was done for preparing individual
developer's patch submission.
I find your trying to find where the problem was introduced by
reading every single change very laudable. However, for the
purpose of "this one was good but somewhere before this one the
things got broken, where is it?", I suspect that bisect would be
a better fit.
The way to use bisect is very simple. First you make sure you
do not have unrecorded changes in your working tree, because
bisect procedure would check out sequences of commits for you to
test there. Then, you give it two "known to be good" and "known
to be bad" commits. The order you give them does not matter,
but "good" one _must_ be ancestor of "bad" one (the code
currently does not check this):
$ git bisect start
$ git bisect good v2.6.12
$ git bisect bad v2.6.13-rc1
Bisecting: 1035 revisions left to test after this
As soon as ou give these two pair, bisect starts thinking, and
checks out one revision that is roughly in the halfway between
these two good and bad commits. You can, if you feel like, see
which one is the first one it wants you to test, like this:
$ git log --max-count=1 --pretty=short bisect
Author: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[PATCH] ptrace_h8300: condition bugfix
At this point, your working tree has this commit checked out.
Compile and test to see if this one is good or bad. If it is
good, then you say "good":
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 517 revisions left to test after this
Bisect eliminated about half commits from the original 1000+
suspects to be innocent, and checked out which one it wants you
to check next. Compile and test to see if this one is good or
bad. If it turns out to be bad, then you say "bad":
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 266 revisions left to test after this
You go on eliminating about half every time you run one test,
and eventually it would find one commit that you may want to
examine more deeply by code inspection.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html