Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I should be able to get http-pull down to the neighborhood of > (current) ssh-pull; http-pull is that slow (when the source repository > isn't packed) because it's entirely sequential, rather than overlapping > requests like ssh-pull now does.
I like those prefetch() and process() code in pull.c very much. I have been wondering if increasing parallelism more by prefetching beyond the immediate parents of the current commit, in "if (get_history)" part of process_commit(). Maybe it is not worth it because doing a commit, its associated tree(s) and its parents would already give us enough parallelism already. > (I've written an untested patch for local-pull, which I'll be testing, > cleaning, and submitting tonight, assuming my newly-arrived monitor > actually works) That is a great news. Thank you for doing this; looking forward to see it, but no rush. Enjoy your new monitor. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
