Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (The thread you mention seems to say that we accept entries being missing
> from the index as if they were unchanged, but I don't see a good reason
> for this; you'd be dealing with the full set in the index for the merge,
> even if you don't have a populated working tree)
You are correct. I was wondering myself why *both* of us
thought (or Linus *seemed* to be agreeing, at least to me) what I
was referring to as I+H made any sense while re-reaing the
> I should have asked sooner, then. :) There's a bunch of clutter to get it
> to work that I can remove if it's not actually necessary.
Yeah, removal of dead code! Go wild, please.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html