Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> (The thread you mention seems to say that we accept entries being missing 
> from the index as if they were unchanged, but I don't see a good reason 
> for this; you'd be dealing with the full set in the index for the merge, 
> even if you don't have a populated working tree)

You are correct.  I was wondering myself why *both* of us
thought (or Linus *seemed* to be agreeing, at least to me) what I
was referring to as I+H made any sense while re-reaing the

> I should have asked sooner, then. :) There's a bunch of clutter to get it 
> to work that I can remove if it's not actually necessary.

Yeah, removal of dead code!  Go wild, please.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to