Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What's the upside? >> >> I can point to one downside: "git". That script right now is simple. If >> you rewrite git-cvsimport-script from shell to perl, it looks the same to >> git. > > What I've been working on was to: > > * have git-cvsimport.perl in the source > > * install it as $(bindir)/git-cvsimport
That was what I suggested too, although I don't really care if it's called .perl or -script in the source. By the way, I'm not sure how the 'git' script is supposed to be used. I know that if there is a git-foo-script file in your path, you can run it as 'git foo'. But what about e.g. git-init-db? You can run that as 'git init-db' today. And 'git read-cache' should work too. And 'git ls-files', and 'git rev-parse', and 'git merge-one-file' and 'git sh-setup-script' in decreasing order of usefulness... But running 'git' without arguments only list the -script commands as available. -- David Kågedal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
