Hi,
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> --- a/transport-helper.c
> +++ b/transport-helper.c
> @@ -484,8 +484,18 @@ static int fetch_with_import(struct transport *transport,
> if (posn->status & REF_STATUS_UPTODATE)
> continue;
> if (data->refspecs)
> + /*
> + * If the remote-helper advertised the refpec
> capability, we
> + * retrieve the local, private ref from it. The
> imported data is
> + * expected there. (see
> Documentation/git-remote-helpers.*).
> + */
> private = apply_refspecs(data->refspecs,
> data->refspec_nr, posn-
>>name);
> else
> + /*
> + * else, the default refspec *:* is implied. The
> remote-helper has
> + * to import the remote heads directly to the local
> heads.
> + * remote-helpers using 'import' should have the
> refspec capability.
> + */
> private = xstrdup(posn->name);
What is _exactly_ the information the reader would want to know here?
Looking at this code:
char *private;
posn = to_fetch[i];
if (posn->status & REF_STATUS_UPTODATE)
continue;
if (!data->refspecs)
private = xstrdup(...);
else
private = apply_refspecs(...);
if (!private)
continue;
read_ref(private, posn->old_sha1);
free(private);
Despite the misleading "old_sha1" name, this loop runs after
fast-import has finished, and the values being read into
to_fetch[]::old_sha1 are object names representing the result.
Callers such as builtin/fetch.c then use these values to write
feedback to the terminal, to populate FETCH_HEAD, and to
determine what new value peer_ref should get.
Shouldn't the comment say something about these SHA-1s not actually
being old? Something like:
/*
* If the remote helper advertised the "refspec" capability,
* it will have the written result of the import to the refs
* named on the right hand side of the first refspec matching
* each ref we were fetching.
*
* (If no "refspec" capability was specified, for historical
* reasons we default to *:*.)
*
* Store the result in to_fetch[i].old_sha1. Callers such
* as "git fetch" can use the value to write feedback to the
* terminal, populate FETCH_HEAD, and determine what new value
* should be written to peer_ref if the update is a
* fast-forward or this is a forced update.
*/
for (i = 0; ...
Hmm?
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
