Jeff King <> writes:

> But what _should_ it show for such an entry? There is no commit to show
> in the reflog walker, but it would still be nice to say "BTW, there was
> a deletion even here". Obviously just skipping it and showing the next
> entry would be better than the current behavior of stopping the
> traversal, but I feel like there must be some better behavior.

Like showing an entry that says "Ref deleted here", which should be
easy to do by creating a phoney commit object and inserting it to
the queue the reflog walker uses, I would guess.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to