Using write_script saves us a few lines of code, and means
we consistently use $SHELL_PATH.

We can also drop the setting of the $pwd variable from
$(pwd). In the first instance, there is no reason to use it
(we can just use $(pwd) directly two lines later, since we
are interpolating the here-document). In the second
instance, it is totally pointless and probably just a
cut-and-paste from the first instance.

Finally, we can use a non-interpolating here document for
the final script, which saves some quoting.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
 t/t7502-commit.sh | 20 +++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t7502-commit.sh b/t/t7502-commit.sh
index 181456a..ddce53a 100755
--- a/t/t7502-commit.sh
+++ b/t/t7502-commit.sh
@@ -266,13 +266,10 @@ test_expect_success 'committer is automatic' '
        test_i18ncmp expect actual
 '
 
-pwd=`pwd`
-cat >> .git/FAKE_EDITOR << EOF
-#! /bin/sh
-echo editor started > "$pwd/.git/result"
+write_script .git/FAKE_EDITOR <<EOF
+echo editor started > "$(pwd)/.git/result"
 exit 0
 EOF
-chmod +x .git/FAKE_EDITOR
 
 test_expect_success 'do not fire editor in the presence of conflicts' '
 
@@ -300,9 +297,7 @@ test_expect_success 'do not fire editor in the presence of 
conflicts' '
        test "$(cat .git/result)" = "editor not started"
 '
 
-pwd=`pwd`
-cat >.git/FAKE_EDITOR <<EOF
-#! $SHELL_PATH
+write_script .git/FAKE_EDITOR <<EOF
 # kill -TERM command added below.
 EOF
 
@@ -339,13 +334,12 @@ test_expect_success 'A single-liner subject with a token 
plus colon is not a foo
 
 '
 
-cat >.git/FAKE_EDITOR <<EOF
-#!$SHELL_PATH
-mv "\$1" "\$1.orig"
+write_script .git/FAKE_EDITOR <<\EOF
+mv "$1" "$1.orig"
 (
        echo message
-       cat "\$1.orig"
-) >"\$1"
+       cat "$1.orig"
+) >"$1"
 EOF
 
 echo '## Custom template' >template
-- 
1.7.11.3.8.ge78f547

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to