> On 04 Aug 2016, at 00:46, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:48:00PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
> 
>> OK. Is this the v2 discussion you are referring to?
>> http://public-inbox.org/git/1461972887-22100-1-git-send-email-sbeller%40google.com/
>> 
>> What format do you suggest?
>> 
>> packet:          git< git-filter-protocol\n
>> packet:          git< version=2\n
>> packet:          git< capability=clean\n
>> packet:          git< capability=smudge\n
>> packet:          git< 0000
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> packet:          git< git-filter-protocol\n
>> packet:          git< version=2\n
>> packet:          git< capability\n
>> packet:          git< clean\n
>> packet:          git< smudge\n
>> packet:          git< 0000
>> 
>> or  ... ?
>> 
>> I would prefer the first one, I think.
> 
> How about:
> 
>  version=2
>  clean=true
>  smudge=true
>  0000
> 
> ? Then we do not have to care about multiple "capability" keys (so
> something naively parsing this could just store them in a string list,
> for example).

Alright. I will go with this solution.

Thanks,
Lars

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to