Lars Schneider <> writes:

> However, besides the bogus performance argument I introduced that function
> to allow packet writs to fail using the `gentle` parameter:
> Would you be OK if I introduce packet_write_gently() that returns `0` if the
> write was OK and `-1` if it failed?

Yes, I agree with you that it would be a good thing to have a
_gently() variant that lets the caller deal with possible error
conditions itself instead of dying.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to